Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Iran Denies Terror Plot

Iran denies any involvement in an attempt to assassinate the Saudi ambassador or to bomb the Israeli embassy. I actually believe them, scary, isn't it? I have been wanting the US to destroy the Iranian government since the 1979 occupation of the US embassy. This story rings of a false flag operation as Iran says: " Iranian officials have denied any involvement with the plot and say the story has been designed to turn public attention away from America's domestic political problems." We have a president who has all but abandoned Israel to embrace radical Islamists taking over Egypt, Libya and other countries in the middle east. We have democratic leaders who have opposed any restraints attempted to control Iranian nuclear and terror projects suddenly jumping on the bash Iran bandwagon: "ERIC HOLDER, US ATTORNEY GENERAL: Today the Department of Justice is announcing charges against two people who allegedly attempted to carry out a deadly plot that was directed by factions of the Iranian government to assassinate a foreign ambassador here in the United States."


"It was a terrific achievement by our law enforcement and intelligence communities, and we will be consulting with our friends and partners around the world about how we can send a very strong message that this kind of action, which violates international norms, must be ended," she said at a news conference.
"This case will, I think, reinforce the well-grounded suspicions of many countries about what they're up to."
"The idea that they would attempt to go to a Mexican drug cartel to solicit murder-for-hire to kill the Saudi ambassador, nobody could make that up, right?" she said.

And Sen. Feinstein:
"Iran is increasingly hostile," she said. "My hope is that there can be some kind of discussion that can be convincing for the Iranians to change course. Absent that, at one time or another, if you project out a number of years, we're on a collision course."

But calmer (and less political) heads say:
JOHN STEWART: But former CIA analyst and Iranian expert Robert Baer is not convinced that Iran is behind the plot and says American officials may have got it wrong.

ROBERT BAER, FORMER CIA ANALYST: This doesn't fit their modus operandi at all. It's completely out of character. They're much better than this. They wouldn't be sending money through an American bank. They wouldn't be going to the cartels in Mexico to do this. It's just not the way they work.

I've followed them for 30 years and they're much more careful, and they always use a proxy between them and the operation, and in this case they didn't.

My thoughts are that we have an administration which has been strongly pro Islamic militant, pro illegal immigration, pro enabling (and arming) mexican drug cartels, in big trouble domestically and which is trying to divert attention away from failed domestic policies by involving the US in another middle east conflict. This is basic politics, when you are in trouble at home create an international crisis in which you can be a hero, or when in trouble internationally, create a crisis at home in which you can be the hero. Obama has tried the international hero route with bin Laden and al Awlaki, and it has not worked. He is trying the domestic crisis with the Occupiers and that is not working. We are going to see a really terrible event in the near future as Obama and the democrats try to save themselves and their socialist agenda. In the meantime the republicans are ignoring the people and trying to force Romney and Christie on a people who clearly want a more conservative candidate and presidential administration.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

Enemy at the Gate

There was a movie out a few years ago, Enemy at the Gate. The story is about a sniper dual during the battle of Stalingrad. In one of the early scenes new conscripts are trucked into the city and every two men are given one rifle and five rounds of ammunition. These men are then forced into an attack on a German defensive position, needless to say the veteran German soldiers cut down the communist draftees. As the Russians begin to retreat, the communist machine guns begin to shoot down their own 'comrades'. Instead of using ammo on the Germans the communists instead shoot their own people. This is so symbolic of how the communists view the world and how they use people, including people who they are 'fighting for' or who are true believers in the communist cause. Why bring this movie up? Because it is illustrative of the Obama regime. Obama will destroy any one in order to accomplish his goal of spreading the misery of the third world to the United States of America. Boeing builds a multi million manufacturing facility in South Carolina to employ 1000 people and the Obama Administration, to appease unions, forces Boeing to abandon their facility. What message does that send to manufacturers around the world? With all the drug violence going on in the USA due to illegal smuggling of drugs, guns, and people from Mexico, Obama's Justice Department raids a guitar manufacturer in Tennessee because of imported wood. The same wood used by other guitar manufacturers in the US, but the raided company is a non-union facility and the other manufacturers are union. Get the picture?
Do not think that Obama is incompetent, he is accomplishing exactly what he has set out to do, and is using wealth envy to continue his campaign for 'fairness' for the proletariat. The 'fairness' of world wide poverty ruled by the comrade master.

Thursday, August 25, 2011

Department of Justice?

Ok, the FBI will allow convicted felons to buy guns in support of the BATFE's disastrous 'Operation Gunwalker' and 'Operation Fast and Furious'; the DOJ will not secure our borders; the DOJ will violate our immigration laws by following the provisions of the DREAM Act, which did not receive congressional approval; the DOJ will not interfere with states legalizing marijuana; but the FBI will raid Gibson's Guitars, again, for violations of importing endangered plant products? Now really? It appears the clowns are running the circus and in the same manner as the German clowns in the 1930's.

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

More on the SPLC

The SPLC and media outlets distribute dis-information on a regular basis, mostly about their enemies, but also to 'trojan horse' some of their allies as enemies. To give them 'street cred' as it were. Case in point, Rep. Peter King (R) NY. Commenting on his hearings on radicalization of American Muslims, the SPLC intimated that Rep. King is a radical right conservative, and many in the mainstream media actually used those words. In reality, Rep. King is far from it. Looking at his record he is more in line with Rep. Mike Doyle (D) PA. King consistently votes on the liberal side of Constitutional and social issues. King is more a Bloomberg republican than a McCain or (gasp) a Reagan republican. King is NOT a radical right winger, nor a Conservative, nor a Constitutionalist, nor really a Republican. He could be the poster boy for RINO's. But the media and the SPLC would have you to believe that he ranks with Teddy Roosevelt, when the truth is that he could not stand in TR's shadow, much less in his shoes. So beware of the info from any of the media, and especially of the SPLC.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Rick Perry or Not?

I was initially enthusiastic about Rick Perry running for president but have done a little digging and now I am not so sure. Granted almost anyone would be better than Obama, but .... I don't know how accurate this info is but here it is. Someone please verify or disprove these points: 14 Reasons Why Rick Perry Would Be A Really, Really Bad President at http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/14-reasons-why-rick-perry-would-be-a-really-really-bad-president
Like I said, I don't know and would expect you to verify anything you read here, any way. Good luck and let's hope Obama doesn't executive order mass illegal alien amnesty to increase his voter turnout. Pray for the best and prepare for the worst.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

She Should Have Gone to Rehab

I have prayed for the family of Amy Winehouse. No parent should have to bury one of their children, it is a cruel twist of fate. It is worse when it is suicide. "Suicide? No one said it was suicide." When you are a habitual drug user, you are committing suicide at a slow and protracted pace. What is worse is that you are dragging the people who love you through a living hell that they don't deserve. So, I have no sympathy for Amy Winehouse, nor do I think that she should receive celebrity lauded upon her. She squandered her talent glorifying drug use and destructive lifestyles, typical of the hollyweirdo crowd. No loss, except to her family. The larger society needs to wash their hands of these degenerate types who are leading our youth down a path of degeneracy and death.

Monday, July 18, 2011

Citizens and Law Enforcement Beware of the SPLC

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) was formed in 1971 in Montgomery, AL by Morris Dees and Joseph Levin Jr. It was allegedly instrumental in securing civil rights for blacks during the civil rights movement, but in actuality it merely rode on the shoulders of the people who did the heavy lifting. The liberal lawyers founded the SPLC for the purpose of cashing in on the civil rights movement through lawsuits. It has always been a voice for the extreme left in American politics. The SPLC has worked tirelessly to advance the radical leftist agenda for subjugating the US to international (socialist) rule. The SPLC sends a free copy of its quarterly magazine, The Intelligence Report, to law enforcement officers who sign up for it. Ostensibly it is for educational purposes but is actually a propaganda organ. The common enemy of the SPLC is any one who is pro-American, and editor Mark Potok is quick to declare that the biggest threat to the US are returning US military veterans, the Tea Party participants, Second Amendment advocates, and any one who disagrees with the Obama administration. If you want to enforce or strengthen the immigration laws, balance the budget, and return jobs to the US, you are then a threat to the US. In its most recent issue, it attempts to vindicate the Dept of Homeland Security report that included all of the above groups of people in its most dangerous threat to the US. The writers include enough actual factual stories in an attempt to give credibility to its point of view on all subjects. It is worth reading, but use other sources to verify the information provided. After all, all coins have two sides but the SPLC only wants you to see their side.